Systematic Reviews of Systematic Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Studies Reviews in Healthcare Research: How to Assess the Methodological Quality of Included Reviews?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Conducting a review of systematic reviews can be challenging, especially when combining quantitative, qualitative and mixed studies reviews. In this methodological discussion paper, we propose (a) typology for categorizing various types (b) an exploration criteria pertaining to three existing critical appraisal tools (ROBIS, AMSTAR 2, MMSR) identify those that could adapted Further work has done develop guidance in conducting, interpreting, reporting combine quantitative data.
منابع مشابه
Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
BACKGROUND Overviews of reviews (overviews) compile information from multiple systematic reviews (SRs) to provide a single synthesis of relevant evidence for decision-making. It is recommended that authors assess and report the methodological quality of SRs in overviews-for example, using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). Currently, there is variation in whether and how ...
متن کاملWorldwide inequality in production of systematic reviews
Background: Investment in science is vital for the development and well-being of societies. This study aims to assess the scientific productivity of countries by quantifying their publication of systematic reviews taking the gross national income per capita (GNIPC) into account. Methods: Medline and ISI Web of Science were searched for systematic reviews published between 1st January 2006 an...
متن کاملMethodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies: a survey of reviews of basic research
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews can serve as a tool in translation of basic life sciences research from laboratory to human research and healthcare. The extent to which reviews of animal research are systematic and unbiased is not known. METHODS We searched, without language restrictions, Medline, Embase, bibliographies of known reviews (1996-2004) and contacted experts to identify citations of...
متن کاملAn Introduction to Living Systematic Reviews
سخن سردبیر Editorial مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان دوره 20، اردیبهشت 1400، 146-145 درآمدی بر مرورهای نظام‌مند زنده An Introduction to Living Systematic Reviews محسن رضائیان[1] M. Rezaeian تا کنون در سخنان سردبیری مجله دانشگاه، درباره انواع مقالات مروری، مطالب گوناگونی را به رشته تحریر در آورده‌ایم. هدف از نگارش این مقالات، آشنا ساختن خوانندگان و نویسندگان فرهیخته م...
متن کاملQualitative and mixed methods in systematic reviews.
Expanding the range of methods of systematic review The logic of systematic reviews is very simple. We use transparent rigorous approaches to undertake primary research, and so we should do the same in bringing together studies to describe what has been studied (a research map) or to integrate the findings of the different studies to answer a research question (a research synthesis). We should ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Mixed Methods Research
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1558-6898', '1558-6901']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211054243